[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F4FDC8F.2010300@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:31:11 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] vt: push down the tty lock so we can see what is
left to tackle
On 03/01/2012 08:50 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
> @@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ int vt_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty,
>
> console = vc->vc_num;
>
> - tty_lock();
Note that this breaks bisection. Further in vt_ioctl, there is a call to
vt_event_wait_ioctl which calls vt_event_wait and that calls
wait_event_interruptible_tty which unlocks BTM.
You change wait_event_interruptible_tty to wait_event_interruptible even
in 4/6.
The VT_WAITEVENT case should have tty_lock until 4/6 (and not longer).
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists