[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F4FE3F7.5030508@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:02:47 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, dhowells@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] bitops: Optimise get_order()
David, could you make a fix for this?
-hpa
On 02/29/2012 04:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:29:04 -0500 Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:20 PM, tip-bot for David Howells
>> <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> Commit-ID: d66acc39c7cee323733c8503b9de1821a56dff7e
>>> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d66acc39c7cee323733c8503b9de1821a56dff7e
>>> Author: David Howells<dhowells@...hat.com>
>>> AuthorDate: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:39:29 +0000
>>> Committer: H. Peter Anvin<hpa@...or.com>
>>> CommitDate: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:47:02 -0800
>>>
>>> bitops: Optimise get_order()
>>
>> This is causing build failures on non-x86 in linux next according to git bisect.
>
> Presumably it needs to include linux/bitops.h (and see below).
>
>>> +static inline __attribute_const__
>>> +int __get_order(unsigned long size)
>>> +{
>>> + int order;
>>> +
>>> + size--;
>>> + size>>= PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
>>> + order = fls(size);
>>> +#else
>>> + order = fls64(size);
>>> +#endif
>
> linux/bitops.h has fls_long() that does this size test and calls the right thing.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists