[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F4ED9F8.3010706@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:07:52 -0800
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@...il.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 V2] pch_uart: Cleanups, board quirks, and user uartclk
parameter
On 02/29/2012 06:06 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> 2012年3月1日10:12 Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>:
>> Perhaps a pch_phub.bios_uartclk parameter could be used for setting up
>> the initial console and once the phub driver is loaded, it can make the
>> necessary changes and fix things up in the uart port?
>
> Yes, once phub driver is installed, uart works with new clock set by phub.
>
>> This would add a binding between the pch_uart and pch_phub code.
> What does the above "binding" mean ?
>
Just that currently I can build pch_uart without the pch_phub driver. It
seems if we were to attempt the above, the pch_uart code would then
require the pch_phub driver and the pch_phub driver would need to know
how to trigger the pch_uart code to setup the uart port again with the
new clock setting.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists