linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Remove tty_lock from the console drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201203012210.19222.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:10:19 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Remove tty_lock from the console drivers

On Thursday 01 March 2012, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> This needs a fair bit of testing and a bit of review wouldn't go amiss, but
> it does drive the tty_lock() mess out of the console and correct chunks of
> console locking in the process.

I've spent an hour looking at the patches and trying to understand the code
paths you touch.  The use of console_lock for more stuff than it's currently
used for is slightly worrying, mostly because it's still an old-style
semaphore and not covered by lockdep because of that, which might make testing
harder, but it also seems to be the logical thing to do as you write.

Other than that and the VT_WAITEVENT issue that Jiri pointed out, nothing
else caught my eye, it all looks good.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/