[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330688075.11248.230.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:34:35 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 12:28 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 12:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 12:08 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> >> It's recommended not to do that and nobody actively
> >> tests this setup, but at least systemd will not abort. So it can be used
> >> to check if the kernel boots and to run some tests.
> >
> > So you don't recommend people use server type setups? Quality
> > engineering that!
>
> I don't follow. Are you saying that CONFIG_CGROUPS=y is incompatible
> with server setups?
It is for mine, I don't need it, not building it gives a smaller kernel
and thus less attack/bug surface.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists