[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120302143323.GB1868@t510.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:33:24 -0300
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: SLAB Out-of-memory diagnostics
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 05:26:07PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Rafael Aquini wrote:
>
> > Following the example at mm/slub.c, add out-of-memory diagnostics to the SLAB
> > allocator to help on debugging OOM conditions. This patch also adds a new
> > sysctl, 'oom_dump_slabs_forced', that overrides the effect of __GFP_NOWARN page
> > allocation flag and forces the kernel to report every slab allocation failure.
> >
> > An example print out looks like this:
> >
> > <snip page allocator out-of-memory message>
> > SLAB: Unable to allocate memory on node 0 (gfp=0x11200)
> > cache: bio-0, object size: 192, order: 0
> > node0: slabs: 3/3, objs: 60/60, free: 0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
>
> I like it, except for the addition of the sysctl. __GFP_NOWARN is used
> for a reason, usually because whatever is allocating memory can gracefully
> handle a failure and should not be emitted to the kernel log under any
> circumstances.
Ok, I'll drop the sysctl part then. Pekka?
David, once again, thanks for your feedback!
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists