[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120302170600.GG18901@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:06:01 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Use gpio_find_by_chip_name() for
omap_hsmmc_gpio_init()
* Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com> [120301 21:23]:
> On Friday 02 March 2012 12:25 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >Use gpio_find_by_chip_name() to find the GPIO pins as they can
> >be dynamically allocated on various gpio_chips.
> >
> >Note that we don't want to touch the platform data as it can
> >now specify the GPIO offset on a named gpio_chip.
> >
> >This removes the need to use callbacks to set the GPIO pins
> >in platform data.
>
> While one of the reasons for those callbacks was to set the GPIO
> pins in platform data, I guess the other and more important one
> was to make sure the init sequencing between twl4030-gpio and the
> mmc device depending on it was done rightly. Doesn't this patch now
> leave the sequencing to work by luck (in the absence of something
> like deferred probe being in place) like is the case of twl6030 and
> mmc init sequence on OMAP4 already?
Nope :) The difference is that we can exit and produce a sensible
error to the user about the particular gpio_chip not being available.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists