[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:43:46 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, ravitillo@....gov,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, asharma@...com,
robert.richter@....com, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
vweaver1@...s.utk.edu, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode
Em Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:08:22PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 06:47:38PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > Arnaldo,
> >
> > What do you think about this patch?
>
> I'm processing perf/core patches today, will get to this one and merge
> or let you know objections,
Ingo,
What is the status of merging
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git;a=summary ?
After that I can try merging Stephane's autho-detect patch,
- Arnaldo
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:49 PM, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> > >> On 2/24/12 8:40 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> No, I don't. Read the code carefully. The for loop sets all known feature
> > >>> bits.
> > >>> Then, the ones not necessary or unused are turned off individually.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Ok, I see now. The __set_feat loop is earlier in builtin-record.c, not the
> > >> util code.
> > >>
> > > Yeah. Arnaldo simplified the original code in builtin-record.c to have the loop
> > > instead of individual set_feat().
> > >
> > >> David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists