[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120305095244.GG1003@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:52:44 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: walter harms <wharms@....de>
Cc: Eric Wollesen <ericw@...p.net>,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
list-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] edac i5000, i5400: fix pointer math in
i5000_get_mc_regs()
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 10:45:39AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 05.03.2012 10:01, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > "pvt->ambase" is a u64 datatype. The intent here is to fill the first
> > half in the first call to pci_read_config_dword() and the other half in
> > the second. Unfortunately the pointer math is wrong so we set the wrong
> > data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Redid it as with a union as Walter Harms suggested.
> > Fixed the same bug in i5400_edac.c as well.
> >
> > I don't have this hardware, so please review carefully.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
> > index 74d6ec34..083e80a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/i5400_edac.c
> > @@ -343,7 +343,13 @@ struct i5400_pvt {
> > struct pci_dev *branch_1; /* 22.0 */
> >
> > u16 tolm; /* top of low memory */
> > - u64 ambase; /* AMB BAR */
> > + union {
> > + u64 ambase; /* AMB BAR */
> > + struct {
> > + u32 ambase_bottom;
> > + u32 ambase_top;
> > + } u;
> > + };
> >
>
> would this work with alignment=8 ?
Are you asking or telling?
I guess I'll add a __packed and resend in case it's an issue.
regards,
dan carpenter
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists