linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] pinctrl: API rework, pinconfig in mapping table, ...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:39:20 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>, B29396@...escale.com,
	s.hauer@...gutronix.de, dongas86@...il.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
	thomas.abraham@...aro.org, tony@...mide.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] pinctrl: API rework, pinconfig in mapping table, ...

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote:

> This is the current set of patches I have outstanding for pinctrl.

It just works! So how could I possibly resist the temptation to
just apply all of this and push to for-next...

If me/Dong has some remaining issues with it we simply have to
fix that up ipso facto.

My U300 is happy anyways and the debugfs is really tasty, telling
me all I need to know.

So now I'll just adopt my driver(s) to support pinconfig in the
tables.

> NOTE: This series assumes that commit 7d23de2 "pinctrl: resurrect verbose
> pinmux-pins" is dropped, since "Show selected function and group in
> pinmux-pins debugfs" re-implements it in a way that's compatible with
> all the API rework and restructing in this series.

Yeah whatever, good-bye with that patch.

> The locking rework change is still under discussion; I haven't seen a
> nak/ack since I was asked to move it later in the series and I explained
> the difficulties in doing so while maintaining correctness.

Yeah whatever, I won't be stubborn with so much nice code coming
my way.

> The Tegra30 pinctrl driver fix should be OK to apply out-of-order if you
> want. I'd even be happy if you squashed it into the original commit that
> added the driver, if you branch doesn't need to be git-stable.

Oh I asked about that a few seconds ago, splendid. I just want to
make sure that e.g. Olof has not pulled the branch into ARM-SoC or
so...?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/