lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120305110441.GC1070@aftab>
Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:04:41 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Cc:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	EDAC devel <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] EDAC: Convert AMD EDAC pieces to use RAS printk
 buffer

On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:52:59AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:

[..]

> 	- the "ras_agent" helper functions is used only for amd64_edac. There's
> no reason for use it elsewhere;

[..]

That can be fixed very easily with the patch below ontop of the current
series (I'll add a proper version of it to the series later). This way,
one does ras_printk() and builds up the message and then, when its done,
calls into the tracepoint like this:

	trace_mce_record(ras_get_decoded_err(), m);

where m is struct mce.

The result is:

[Hardware Error]: CPU:0 MC4_STATUS[-|UE|-|PCC|AddrV|UECC]: 0xb607a10009080a23 MC4_ADDR: 0x0000000955647380
[Hardware Error]: Northbridge Error (node 0): DRAM ECC error detected on the NB.
[Hardware Error]: EDAC MC2: UE page 0x955647, offset 0x380, grain 0, row 2, labels ":": amd64_edac

^^^ This line comes from the respective edac driver.

[Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, mem/io: MEM, mem-tx: WR, part-proc: RES (no timeout)
[Hardware Error]: CPU: 0, MCGc/s: 0/0, MC4: b607a10009080a23, ADDR/MISC: 0000000955647380/dead57ac1ba0babe, RIP: 00:<0000000000000000>, TSC: 0, TIME: 0, SOCKET: 0


> non MCA drivers should also generate tracepoints;

yes, they should define a tracepoint which fits the hardware error
reporting scheme they're using.

--
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ras.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ras.h
index 92199af2ab7b..b51838514259 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ras.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ras.h
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
 extern bool ras_agent;
 
 #define PR_EMERG	BIT(0)
-#define PR_WARNING	BIT(1)
-#define PR_CONT		BIT(2)
+#define PR_WARNING	BIT(4)
+#define PR_CONT		BIT(8)
 
 extern const char *ras_get_decoded_err(void);
 extern void ras_printk(unsigned long flags, const char *fmt, ...);
diff --git a/arch/x86/ras/ras.c b/arch/x86/ras/ras.c
index 5edfe30034d3..868d732c6cd4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/ras/ras.c
+++ b/arch/x86/ras/ras.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void ras_printk(unsigned long flags, const char *fmt, ...)
 	if (!ras_agent) {
 		if (flags & PR_EMERG)
 			pr_emerg("%s", buf);
-		if (flags & PR_WARNING)
+		else if (flags & PR_WARNING)
 			pr_warning("%s", buf);
 		else if (flags & PR_CONT)
 			pr_cont("%s", buf);
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 29e153c57e33..c0f31f953c70 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -1902,10 +1902,7 @@ static void amd64_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct mce *m)
 	sys_addr = get_error_address(m);
 	syndrome = extract_syndrome(m->status);
 
-	if (ras_agent)
-		ras_printk(PR_EMERG, "ERR_ADDR: 0x%llx", sys_addr);
-	else
-		amd64_mc_err(mci, "CE ERROR_ADDRESS= 0x%llx\n", sys_addr);
+	amd64_mc_err(mci, "CE ERROR_ADDRESS= 0x%llx\n", sys_addr);
 
 	pvt->ops->map_sysaddr_to_csrow(mci, sys_addr, syndrome);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_core.h b/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
index e48ab3108ad8..62a32b3fa660 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
@@ -49,8 +49,17 @@
 #define edac_printk(level, prefix, fmt, arg...) \
 	printk(level "EDAC " prefix ": " fmt, ##arg)
 
-#define edac_mc_printk(mci, level, fmt, arg...) \
-	printk(level "EDAC MC%d: " fmt, mci->mc_idx, ##arg)
+#define edac_mc_printk(mci, level, fmt, arg...)					\
+({										\
+	if (ras_agent) {							\
+		unsigned pr_lvl = BIT((unsigned)(level[1] - '0'));		\
+										\
+		ras_printk(pr_lvl, HW_ERR "EDAC MC%d" fmt,			\
+			   mci->mc_idx, ##arg);					\
+	}									\
+	else									\
+		printk(level "EDAC MC%d: " fmt, mci->mc_idx, ##arg);		\
+})
 
 #define edac_mc_chipset_printk(mci, level, prefix, fmt, arg...) \
 	printk(level "EDAC " prefix " MC%d: " fmt, mci->mc_idx, ##arg)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index 3b3db477b5d0..446853a303c4 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -703,11 +703,7 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (edac_mc_get_log_ce()) {
-		if (ras_agent)
-			ras_printk(PR_CONT, ", row: %d, channel: %d\n",
-				   row, channel);
-		else
+	if (edac_mc_get_log_ce())
 			/* FIXME - put in DIMM location */
 			edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
 					"CE page 0x%lx, offset 0x%lx, grain %d,"
@@ -718,7 +714,6 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ce(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
 					row, channel,
 					mci->csrows[row].channels[channel].label,
 					msg);
-	}
 
 	mci->ce_count++;
 	mci->csrows[row].ce_count++;
@@ -790,16 +785,12 @@ void edac_mc_handle_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
 		pos += chars;
 	}
 
-	if (edac_mc_get_log_ue()) {
-		if (ras_agent)
-			ras_printk(PR_CONT, "row: %d\n", row);
-		else
+	if (edac_mc_get_log_ue())
 			edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_EMERG,
 				       "UE page 0x%lx, offset 0x%lx, grain %d,"
 				       " row %d, labels \"%s\": %s\n",
 				       page_frame_number, offset_in_page,
 				       mci->csrows[row].grain, row, labels, msg);
-	}
 
 	if (edac_mc_get_panic_on_ue())
 		panic("EDAC MC%d: UE page 0x%lx, offset 0x%lx, grain %d, "

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ