[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJOA=zM9Qo=V1He=HfL-6KaFV_Yai=KyC5hbca5iQ3uMO_pZzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:15:03 -0800
From: "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, patches@...aro.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergman <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] clk: basic clock hardware types
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>> +#define DEFINE_CLK_GATE(_name, _parent_name, _parent_ptr, \
>> + _flags, _reg, _bit_idx, \
>> + _gate_flags, _lock) \
>> + static struct clk _name; \
>> + static char *_name##_parent_names[] = { \
>> + _parent_name, \
>> + }; \
>> + static struct clk *_name##_parents[] = { \
>> + _parent_ptr, \
>> + }; \
>> + static struct clk_gate _name##_hw = { \
>> + .hw = { \
>> + .clk = &_name, \
>> + }, \
>> + .reg = _reg, \
>> + .bit_idx = _bit_idx, \
>> + .flags = _gate_flags \
>> + .lock = _lock, \
>> + }; \
>> + static struct clk _name = { \
>> + .name = #_name, \
>> + .ops = &clk_gate_ops, \
>> + .hw = &_name##_hw.hw, \
>> + .parent_names = _name##_parent_names, \
>> + .num_parents = \
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(_name##parent_names), \
>
> Hi Mike
>
> This should be _name##_parent_names, i.e. you are missing a _.
>
> With this and the previous change, i get something which at least
> compiles...
The gate clock is the only type of the basic clocks that I do not
(currently) use in my OMAP port and it's test coverage has suffered as
a result. My bad.
Thanks for the review and the patch in the separate thread. I'll take
the changes in.
Regards,
Mike
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists