lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO8GWqkz_pR8jshQqNx8c2_jQ+b=RO-PHukerLaHbq8sk3Va-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:48:18 -0600
From:	"Clark, Rob" <rob@...com>
To:	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 3/3] dma_buf: Add documentation for the
 new cpu access support

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:36:01PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt |  102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt b/Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt
>> index 225f96d..f12542b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt
>> @@ -32,8 +32,12 @@ The buffer-user
>>  *IMPORTANT*: [see https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/20/211 for more details]
>>  For this first version, A buffer shared using the dma_buf sharing API:
>>  - *may* be exported to user space using "mmap" *ONLY* by exporter, outside of
>> -   this framework.
>> -- may be used *ONLY* by importers that do not need CPU access to the buffer.
>> +  this framework.
>> +- with this new iteration of the dma-buf api cpu access from the kernel has been
>> +  enable, see below for the details.
>> +
>> +dma-buf operations for device dma only
>> +--------------------------------------
>>
>>  The dma_buf buffer sharing API usage contains the following steps:
>>
>> @@ -219,7 +223,99 @@ NOTES:
>>     If the exporter chooses not to allow an attach() operation once a
>>     map_dma_buf() API has been called, it simply returns an error.
>>
>> -Miscellaneous notes:
>> +Kernel cpu access to a dma-buf buffer object
>> +--------------------------------------------
>> +
>> +The motivation to allow cpu access from the kernel to a dma-buf object from the
>> +importers side are:
>> +- fallback operations, e.g. if the devices is connected to a usb bus and the
>> +  kernel needs to shuffle the data around first before sending it away.
>> +- full transperancy for existing users on the importer side, i.e. userspace
>> +  should not notice the difference between a normal object from that subsystem
>> +  and an imported one backed by a dma-buf. This is really important for drm
>> +  opengl drivers that expect to still use all the existing upload/download
>> +  paths.
>> +
>> +Access to a dma_buf from the kernel context involves three steps:
>> +
>> +1. Prepare access, which invalidate any necessary caches and make the object
>> +   available for cpu access.
>> +2. Access the object page-by-page with the dma_buf map apis
>> +3. Finish access, which will flush any necessary cpu caches and free reserved
>> +   resources.
>
> Where it should be decided which operations are being done to the buffer
> when it is passed to user space and back to kernel space?
>
> How about spliting these operations to those done on the first time the
> buffer is passed to the user space (mapping to kernel address space, for
> example) and those required every time buffer is passed from kernel to user
> and back (cache flusing)?
>
> I'm asking since any unnecessary time-consuming operations, especially as
> heavy as mapping the buffer, should be avoidable in subsystems dealing
> with streaming video, cameras etc., i.e. non-GPU users.


Well, this is really something for the buffer exporter to deal with..
since there is no way for an importer to create a userspace mmap'ing
of the buffer.  A lot of these expensive operations go away if you
don't even create a userspace virtual mapping in the first place ;-)

BR,
-R

>
>> +1. Prepare acces
>> +
>> +   Before an importer can acces a dma_buf object with the cpu from the kernel
>> +   context, it needs to notice the exporter of the access that is about to
>> +   happen.
>> +
>> +   Interface:
>> +      int dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>> +                                size_t start, size_t len,
>> +                                enum dma_data_direction direction)
>> +
>> +   This allows the exporter to ensure that the memory is actually available for
>> +   cpu access - the exporter might need to allocate or swap-in and pin the
>> +   backing storage. The exporter also needs to ensure that cpu access is
>> +   coherent for the given range and access direction. The range and access
>> +   direction can be used by the exporter to optimize the cache flushing, i.e.
>> +   access outside of the range or with a different direction (read instead of
>> +   write) might return stale or even bogus data (e.g. when the exporter needs to
>> +   copy the data to temporaray storage).
>> +
>> +   This step might fail, e.g. in oom conditions.
>> +
>> +2. Accessing the buffer
>> +
>> +   To support dma_buf objects residing in highmem cpu access is page-based using
>> +   an api similar to kmap. Accessing a dma_buf is done in aligned chunks of
>> +   PAGE_SIZE size. Before accessing a chunk it needs to be mapped, which returns
>> +   a pointer in kernel virtual address space. Afterwards the chunk needs to be
>> +   unmapped again. There is no limit on how often a given chunk can be mapped
>> +   and unmmapped, i.e. the importer does not need to call begin_cpu_access again
>> +   before mapping the same chunk again.
>> +
>> +   Interfaces:
>> +      void *dma_buf_kmap(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long);
>> +      void dma_buf_kunmap(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long, void *);
>> +
>> +   There are also atomic variants of these interfaces. Like for kmap they
>> +   facilitate non-blocking fast-paths. Neither the importer nor the exporter (in
>> +   the callback) is allowed to block when using these.
>> +
>> +   Interfaces:
>> +      void *dma_buf_kmap_atomic(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long);
>> +      void dma_buf_kunmap_atomic(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long, void *);
>> +
>> +   For importers all the restrictions of using kmap apply, like the limited
>> +   supply of kmap_atomic slots. Hence an importer shall only hold onto at most 2
>> +   atomic dma_buf kmaps at the same time (in any given process context).
>> +
>> +   dma_buf kmap calls outside of the range specified in begin_cpu_access are
>> +   undefined. If the range is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, kmap needs to succeed on
>> +   the partial chunks at the beginning and end but may return stale or bogus
>> +   data outside of the range (in these partial chunks).
>> +
>> +   Note that these calls need to always succeed. The exporter needs to complete
>> +   any preparations that might fail in begin_cpu_access.
>> +
>> +3. Finish access
>> +
>> +   When the importer is done accessing the range specified in begin_cpu_acces,
>> +   it needs to announce this to the exporter (to facilitate cache flushing and
>> +   unpinning of any pinned resources). The result of of any dma_buf kmap calls
>> +   after end_cpu_access is undefined.
>> +
>> +   Interface:
>> +      void dma_buf_end_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dma_buf,
>> +                               size_t start, size_t len,
>> +                               enum dma_data_direction dir);
>> +
>> +
>> +Miscellaneous notes
>> +-------------------
>> +
>>  - Any exporters or users of the dma-buf buffer sharing framework must have
>>    a 'select DMA_SHARED_BUFFER' in their respective Kconfigs.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Sakari Ailus
> e-mail: sakari.ailus@....fi     jabber/XMPP/Gmail: sailus@...iisi.org.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linaro-mm-sig mailing list
> Linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-mm-sig
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ