[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwQtEPGwK-W8H3Fa0EZUOV057kj_xhUXONZRcyeZtSt3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:30:19 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] flush_tlb_range() needs ->page_table_lock when
->mmap_sem is not held
Is this safe? And why does it need it? Please add more explanations.
Linus
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 5f34bd8..a876871 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2277,8 +2277,8 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> set_page_dirty(page);
> list_add(&page->lru, &page_list);
> }
> - spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end);
> + spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, start, end);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, &page_list, lru) {
> page_remove_rmap(page);
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists