linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120305214747.GA9425@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:47:47 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Dilan Lee <dilee@...dia.com>,
	Manjunath GKondaiah <manjunath.gkondaiah@...aro.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:47:41AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -587,6 +587,10 @@ struct device_dma_parameters {
>   * @mutex:	Mutex to synchronize calls to its driver.
>   * @bus:	Type of bus device is on.
>   * @driver:	Which driver has allocated this
> + * @deferred_probe: entry in deferred_probe_list which is used to retry the
> + * 		binding of drivers which were unable to get all the resources
> + * 		needed by the device; typically because it depends on another
> + * 		driver getting probed first.
>   * @platform_data: Platform data specific to the device.
>   * 		Example: For devices on custom boards, as typical of embedded
>   * 		and SOC based hardware, Linux often uses platform_data to point
> @@ -646,6 +650,7 @@ struct device {
>  	struct bus_type	*bus;		/* type of bus device is on */
>  	struct device_driver *driver;	/* which driver has allocated this
>  					   device */
> +	struct list_head	deferred_probe;
>  	void		*platform_data;	/* Platform specific data, device
>  					   core doesn't touch it */
>  	struct dev_pm_info	power;

This can go into the "struct device_private" structure instead, right?
That would be better to ensure that no non-driver-core code ever touches
this thing.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/