| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120305222614.GB5656@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:26:14 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com, ravitillo@....gov,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, robert.richter@....com,
ming.m.lin@...el.com, vweaver1@...s.utk.edu, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode
Em Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:43:23PM -0800, Arun Sharma escreveu:
> On 3/5/12 12:35 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:30:33PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> >>On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 16:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >Do you have any specific complaints about it?
>
> I think --tui code paths have some bugs that cause it to SIGSEGV,
> while the --stdio paths don't. I think much of it has to do with how
We'll have the same problem with --gtk, i.e. as much as we librarise the
backend code, there will be bugs in the frontends, but then we'll fix as
in this case.
What I was more concerned was what usability problems Peter and Stephane
had with the TUI, i.e. any missing feature they like on --stdio, or any
annoyance wrt color schemes, key bindings, etc.
I made an effort to try and have the look and feel of the TUI to
resemble as much as possible the one in --stdio, while allowing
usability improvements not possible in the --stdio case, like:
. Folding/unfolding callchains
. Zooming by DSO, etc
. Going to annotate and back really quickly
. Initial support for navigation in the annotate window (just callq for
now, but jumps, etc are on the plans)
. Toggling source code on/off on the annotation window
> often that particular combination of command line options is used.
>
> Here's an example:
>
> # perf record -ag -- sleep 3
> # perf report -G -s pid --tui # SIGSEGV
Ok, now this is a good report, I managed to reproduce and will work on a
fix, thanks,
- Arnaldo
> # perf report -G -s pid --stdio # works fine
>
> Details attached.
>
> -Arun
>
>
>
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 139975795275488 (LWP 13155)]
> symbol__inc_addr_samples (sym=0x91eb90, map=<value optimized out>, evidx=0, addr=120416) at util/annotate.c:73
> 73 util/annotate.c: No such file or directory.
> in util/annotate.c
> (gdb) bt
> #0 symbol__inc_addr_samples (sym=0x91eb90, map=<value optimized out>, evidx=0, addr=120416) at util/annotate.c:73
> #1 0x0000000000410b5d in process_sample_event (tool=<value optimized out>, event=0x7f4ea28e26b0, sample=0x7fffcc1ca8f0, evsel=0x823ea0, machine=0x822290) at builtin-report.c:127
> #2 0x00000000004433ca in flush_sample_queue (s=0x822230, tool=0x7fffcc1cc340) at util/session.c:528
> #3 0x0000000000444d16 in __perf_session__process_events (session=0x822230, data_offset=<value optimized out>, data_size=<value optimized out>, file_size=<value optimized out>, tool=0x7fffcc1cc340)
> at util/session.c:1175
> #4 0x0000000000445217 in perf_session__process_events (self=0x822230, tool=0x7fffcc1cc340) at util/session.c:1191
> #5 0x000000000041015b in cmd_report (argc=0, argv=0x7fffcc1cc830, prefix=<value optimized out>) at builtin-report.c:311
> #6 0x00000000004051b9 in handle_internal_command (argc=4, argv=0x7fffcc1cc830) at perf.c:273
> #7 0x0000000000405623 in main (argc=4, argv=0x479218) at perf.c:388
>
> (gdb) p /x sym->start
> $5 = 0xffffffff8100fb74
> (gdb) p /x addr
> $6 = 0x1d660
> (gdb) p offset
> $7 = 2130762476
>
> 54 int symbol__inc_addr_samples(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
> 55 int evidx, u64 addr)
> 56 {
> 57 unsigned offset;
> 58 struct annotation *notes;
> 59 struct sym_hist *h;
> 60
> 61 notes = symbol__annotation(sym);
> 62 if (notes->src == NULL)
> 63 return -ENOMEM;
> 64
> 65 pr_debug3("%s: addr=%#" PRIx64 "\n", __func__, map->unmap_ip(map, addr));
> 66
> 67 if (addr >= sym->end)
> 68 return 0;
> 69
> 70 offset = addr - sym->start;
> 71 h = annotation__histogram(notes, evidx);
> 72 h->sum++;
> 73 h->addr[offset]++; <-- potential bad memory reference
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists