[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F545E2C.8080408@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:03:16 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: lenb@...nel.org, deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM/Sleep, ACPI: Teach acpi_cpu_soft_notify() to handle
CPU hotplug in suspend/resume path
On 03/05/2012 04:03 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2012, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> acpi_cpu_soft_notify handles only CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DEAD events. However,
>> during a system-wide suspend/hibernation operation, CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN and
>> CPU_DEAD_FROZEN events are sent as part of CPU hotplug.
>>
>> Those events are really no different from regular CPU hotplug in this context,
>> and hence acpi shouldn't ignore them. So, teach acpi_cpu_soft_notify() to
>> handle those events as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> I am no ACPI expert! So requesting a thorough review of this patch..
>
> Well, as far as I can tell, it _looks_ correct. That said, I don't think
> anyone will really tell you on the basis of code review alone, this requires
> testing.
>
> Since Len hasn't been very responsive recently, I can take this patch into
> linux-pm/linux-next and see what the feedback is.
That would be great! Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists