[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120306100336.GB14298@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:33:36 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> [2012-03-06 10:14:11]:
> Does volanomark still do yield(),
I could count 3.5M yield() calls across 16 cpus over a period of 5.4sec,
so yes it does seem to make very good use of yeild()!
> thereby invoking a random
> shuffle of thread scheduling and pretty much voluntarily
> ejecting itself from most scheduler performance considerations?
>
> If it uses a real locking primitive such as futexes then its
> performance matters more.
Good point ..I will gather more data for additional benchmarks
(tbench, sysbench) and post shortly.
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists