[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACvQF50WRCrOPabhim+LC8fH_MNZ-3JLCDnKqzLdyHHXn_H3gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 23:26:24 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] implement per-cpu&per-domain state machine call_srcu()
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:57 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> srcu_head is bigger, it is worth, it provides more ability and simplify
>> the srcu code.
>
> Dubious claim.. memory footprint of various data structures is deemed
> important. rcu_head is 16 bytes, srcu_head is 32 bytes. I think it would
> be real nice not to have two different callback structures and not grow
> them as large.
Also "Dubious" "simplify"?
bigger struct makes we can store ->check_seq in the callback, makes
the processing simply.
bigger struct is not required here, we can use a little complex way(batches)
to do it.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists