[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331048298.11248.320.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:38:18 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] implement per-cpu&per-domain state machine
call_srcu()
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 23:17 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:57 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >> /*
> >> + * 'return left < right;' but handle the overflow issues.
> >> + * The same as 'return (long)(right - left) > 0;' but it cares more.
> >
> > About what? And why? We do the (long)(a - b) thing all over the kernel,
> > why would you care more?
>
> @left is constants of the callers(callbacks's snapshot), @right
> increases very slow.
> if (long)(right - left) is a big negative, we have to wait for a long
> time in this kinds of overflow.
> this kinds of overflow can not happen in this safe_less_than()
I'm afraid I'm being particularly dense, but what?!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists