[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120306031619.GB14274@barrios>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:16:20 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] page_alloc.c: Slightly improve the logic in
__alloc_pages_high_priority
Hi Kautuk,
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:18:25AM -0500, Kautuk Consul wrote:
> The loop in __alloc_pages_high_priority() seems to be checking for
> (!page) and (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) multiple times.
>
> In fact, we don't really need to check (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
> for every iteration of the loop as the gfp_mask remains constant.
>
> Slightly improve the logic in __alloc_pages_high_priority() to
> eliminate these multiple condition checks.
Thansk for your effort.
Surely we don't need mutliple condition check but it's not fast-path
and not a problem about readability. So I don't want to increase text
size unnecessary if it doesn't have a benefit.
barrios@...rios:~/linux-2.6$ size mm/page_alloc.o
text data bss dec hex filename
32772 1307 576 34655 875f mm/page_alloc.o
barrios@...rios:~/linux-2.6$ size mm/page_alloc.o.your_patch
text data bss dec hex filename
32804 1307 576 34687 877f mm/page_alloc.o.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists