[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203062341460.2742@ionos>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 23:42:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 04/25][RFC 3.0.23-rt39-rc1]
revert-seqlock-remove-unused-functions
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, John Kacur wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Does this really need to be reverted? I don't believe the other
> reverts make use of these functions either. Looking upstream ,they are
> also not used here, so the original patch should be pushed upstream if
> anything.
It's applied later on again .... :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists