linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to test CMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:09:49 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
CC:	Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	workgroup.linux@....com, mina86@...a86.com,
	Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper
 to test CMA

On 03/07/2012 01:05 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> 2012/3/7 Cong Wang<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>:
>> On 03/07/2012 12:57 PM, Barry Song wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> if you think so, pls do that and send v4 with your s-o-b.
>>>
>>
>> This is not a good attitude, nor helps your patch to be merged...
>>
>> Be collaborative.
>
> some people like focusing on trivial things. i said i really didn't
> care about the details whether it is /dev, /proc, /sys.
> if you like a /proc, pls do it by yourself and i will agree. but i
> will not waste my time on that.

This is definitely not trivial... What's more, kernel developers *do* 
care about trivial things (trivial@...nel.org).

We are trying to make your patch perfect, you just refused, sigh...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/