[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4zPn=phmWw8qSed93QWnTdOF7peh71uom0i6idR1_jFSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 13:40:32 +0800
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
workgroup.linux@....com, mina86@...a86.com,
Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to
test CMA
2012/3/7 Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>:
> On 03/07/2012 01:17 PM, Barry Song wrote:
>>
>> that is definitely trivial as we are talking about things in a test
>> module. and we are not talking about any bug in the test module as
>> well.
>
>
> I am quite sure *any* patches have bugs will not be merged, IOW, you seem
> don't want your patch merged. :) Fine. That is all.
Cong, i was not againest what you said as a techinical issue.
definitely, it can be a /proc, it is also able to be /sys if you like.
/proc is probably better than /dev from the original design thinking in kernel.
here i focused on people have this module to test CMA at runtime. i
also thought Michal also wants this module to show people the usage of
CMA as well.
i'll much appreciate if you have time to move it to /proc.
-barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists