| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 13:40:32 +0800 From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> Cc: Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, workgroup.linux@....com, mina86@...a86.com, Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to test CMA 2012/3/7 Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>: > On 03/07/2012 01:17 PM, Barry Song wrote: >> >> that is definitely trivial as we are talking about things in a test >> module. and we are not talking about any bug in the test module as >> well. > > > I am quite sure *any* patches have bugs will not be merged, IOW, you seem > don't want your patch merged. :) Fine. That is all. Cong, i was not againest what you said as a techinical issue. definitely, it can be a /proc, it is also able to be /sys if you like. /proc is probably better than /dev from the original design thinking in kernel. here i focused on people have this module to test CMA at runtime. i also thought Michal also wants this module to show people the usage of CMA as well. i'll much appreciate if you have time to move it to /proc. -barry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists