[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F5703B7.50104@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:44:07 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] implement per-cpu&per-domain state machine call_srcu()
On 03/06/2012 11:32 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 22:44 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> it is srcu_barrier(), it have to wait all callbacks complete for all
>> cpus since it is per-cpu
>> implementation.
>>
> If you enqueue each callback as a work, flush_workqueue() alone should
> do that. It'll wait for completion of all currently enqueued works but
> ignores new works.
Callbacks are not queued in the workqueue when call_srcu().
They are delivered(queued in the workqueue) after a grace period,
so we need to wait for all are delivered before flush_workqueue().
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists