[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120307070000.GA4426@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 08:00:00 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...gle.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] s390: Use common fork_idle_from_wq in smpboot
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:41:14PM -0800, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> Cleanup. Instead of reimplementing fork_idle on wq and idle task caching,
> use fork_idle_from_wq().
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 38 +++++---------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
Your patch won't apply on linux-next because of rather large code changes.
Anyway see below a patch that applies cleanly (and works) on s390.
Thanks for cleaning this up!
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 36 +++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ enum {
struct pcpu {
struct cpu cpu;
- struct task_struct *idle; /* idle process for the cpu */
struct _lowcore *lowcore; /* lowcore page(s) for the cpu */
unsigned long async_stack; /* async stack for the cpu */
unsigned long panic_stack; /* panic stack for the cpu */
@@ -724,26 +723,10 @@ static void __cpuinit smp_start_secondar
cpu_idle();
}
-struct create_idle {
- struct work_struct work;
- struct task_struct *idle;
- struct completion done;
- int cpu;
-};
-
-static void __cpuinit smp_fork_idle(struct work_struct *work)
-{
- struct create_idle *c_idle;
-
- c_idle = container_of(work, struct create_idle, work);
- c_idle->idle = fork_idle(c_idle->cpu);
- complete(&c_idle->done);
-}
-
/* Upping and downing of CPUs */
int __cpuinit __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct create_idle c_idle;
+ struct task_struct *idle;
struct pcpu *pcpu;
int rc;
@@ -753,22 +736,14 @@ int __cpuinit __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
if (pcpu_sigp_retry(pcpu, sigp_initial_cpu_reset, 0) !=
sigp_order_code_accepted)
return -EIO;
- if (!pcpu->idle) {
- c_idle.done = COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(c_idle.done);
- INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&c_idle.work, smp_fork_idle);
- c_idle.cpu = cpu;
- schedule_work(&c_idle.work);
- wait_for_completion(&c_idle.done);
- if (IS_ERR(c_idle.idle))
- return PTR_ERR(c_idle.idle);
- pcpu->idle = c_idle.idle;
- }
- init_idle(pcpu->idle, cpu);
+ idle = fork_idle_from_wq(cpu);
+ if (IS_ERR(idle))
+ return PTR_ERR(idle);
rc = pcpu_alloc_lowcore(pcpu, cpu);
if (rc)
return rc;
pcpu_prepare_secondary(pcpu, cpu);
- pcpu_attach_task(pcpu, pcpu->idle);
+ pcpu_attach_task(pcpu, idle);
pcpu_start_fn(pcpu, smp_start_secondary, NULL);
while (!cpu_online(cpu))
cpu_relax();
@@ -855,7 +830,6 @@ void __init smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
struct pcpu *pcpu = pcpu_devices;
boot_cpu_address = stap();
- pcpu->idle = current;
pcpu->state = CPU_STATE_CONFIGURED;
pcpu->address = boot_cpu_address;
pcpu->lowcore = (struct _lowcore *)(unsigned long) store_prefix();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists