[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120306163742.b71bf57b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 16:37:42 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] writeback: introduce the pageout work
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:25:55 +0800
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> > > get_page() looks the perfect solution to verify if the struct inode
> > > pointer (w/o igrab) is still live and valid.
> > >
> > > [...upon rethinking...] Oh but still we need to lock some page to pin
> > > the inode during the writeout. Then there is the dilemma: if the page
> > > is locked, we effectively keep it from being written out...
> >
> > No, all you need to do is to structure the code so that after the page
> > gets unlocked, the kernel thread does not touch the address_space. So
> > the processing within the kthread is along the lines of
> >
> > writearound(locked_page)
> > {
> > write some pages preceding locked_page; /* touches address_space */
>
> It seems the above line will lead to ABBA deadlock.
>
> At least btrfs will lock a number of pages in lock_delalloc_pages().
Well, this code locks multiple pages too. I forget what I did about
that - probably trylock. Dirty pages aren't locked for very long.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists