[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120307132228.GA30159@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:22:28 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
To: leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com
Cc: penberg@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmevent: Use 'struct vmevent_attr' for vmevent_fd() ABI
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 07:53:37AM +0000, leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Anton Vorontsov [mailto:anton.vorontsov@...aro.org]
> > Sent: 07 March, 2012 01:00
> > To: Pekka Enberg
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Moiseichuk Leonid (Nokia-MP/Espoo);
> ...
> > Sorry for hijacking this thread, but speaking of big changes. Are there any
> > plans or ideas to add other methods of sampling, i.e. something not timer-
> > based?
> ...
> > Though, current vmevent seems not so lightweigh in sense of battery usage
> > and accuracy (i.e. how quick we're able to detect the crossed threshold). To
> > get better accuracy we would need to run timer at higher frequencies, but
> > then we would waste more battery.
>
> One of patch I sent was about switching to deferred timer. This API should not be 100% accurate first, and using deferred
> timers will allow to sleep properly when system has no activity. I hope Pekka will accept the next patch as well.
Nice idea!
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists