[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <00F74E64-A5EC-4DF8-A347-2D8BC5659638@xyratex.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:11:28 -0500
From: Mark Salyzyn <mark_salyzyn@...atex.com>
To: santoshprasadnayak@...il.com
Cc: Mark Salyzyn <mark_salyzyn@...atex.com>,
lindar_liu <lindar_liu@...sh.com>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Jack Wang <jack_wang@...sh.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] pm8001: fix endian issue with code optimization.
One more NAK:
> @@ -3497,7 +3499,7 @@ static int mpi_hw_event(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, void* piomb)
> static void process_one_iomb(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, void *piomb)
> {
> u32 pHeader = (u32)*(u32 *)piomb;
> - u8 opc = (u8)((le32_to_cpu(pHeader)) & 0xFFF);
> + u8 opc = (u8)(pHeader & 0xFFF);
>
> PM8001_MSG_DBG(pm8001_ha, pm8001_printk("process_one_iomb:"));
The swap is necessary. Should be:
__le32 pHeader = (__le32)*(__le32 *)piomb;
instead ...
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
On Mar 7, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> NAK on one point.
>
> The fw_flash_Update_resp structure erroneously defines tag as a dma_addr_t, when in fact it should be an __le32, as the response hTag is reported in this field. The removal of the le32_to_cpu(ppayload->tag) was done to remove a warning, but is incorrect. The warning should have been solved by correctly defining the tag element in the structure.
>
> Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
>
> On Feb 26, 2012, at 11:51 PM, Jack Wang wrote:
>
>> Thanks for fix.
>> Acked-by: Jack Wang <jack_wang@...sh.com>
>>>
>>> From: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
>>>
>>> 1. Fix endian issue.
>>> 2. Fix the following warning :
>>> " drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c:2932:32: warning: comparison
>>> between 'enum sas_device_type' and 'enum sas_dev_type'".
>>> 3. Few code optimization.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> . . .
>>> @@ -3149,7 +3152,7 @@ mpi_fw_flash_update_resp(struct pm8001_hba_info
>>> *pm8001_ha, void *piomb)
>>> struct fw_control_ex fw_control_context;
>>> struct fw_flash_Update_resp *ppayload
>>> (struct fw_flash_Update_resp *)(piomb + 4);
>>> - u32 tag = le32_to_cpu(ppayload->tag);
>>> + u32 tag = ppayload->tag;
>>> struct pm8001_ccb_info *ccb = &pm8001_ha->ccb_info[tag];
>>> status = le32_to_cpu(ppayload->status);
>>> memcpy(&fw_control_context,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists