[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOD=uF6nG=r9GLtzdds8T_67RmOyOhD756Kj_EGXsuDgfQR7nA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:37:01 +0530
From: santosh prasad nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: JBottomley@...allels.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
mkp@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] sd: set BIO_MAPPED_INTEGRITY bit correctly in sd_dif_prepare().
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:11:35PM +0530, santosh nayak wrote:
>> From: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
>>
>> Value of BIO_MAPPED_INTEGRITY is 11. Intention was to set the 11th bit.
>
> Also, can we introduce:
>
> #define bio_set_flag(bio, flag) ((bio)->bi_flags |= (1 << (flag)))
>
set_bit() can do the same task.
Can you please explain why do we need a new macro ?
> Then hunt down and kill all the places that manipulate bi_flags by hand?
> We might also need:
>
> #define bio_set_flag_atomic(bio, flag) set_bit(&(bio)->bi_flags, (flag))
for atomic operation we have __set_bit() . Is there any need to define
to new macro ?
Regards
Santosh
>
> --
> Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
> operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
> a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists