[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120307024306.GA18493@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 21:43:07 -0500
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: triage for March 6, 2012
Due to the nature of the commits I've been making lately, when I see
a fail in linux-next, I have to wonder if I somehow caused it by a
header shuffle. After pouring over the kisskb linux-next results,
I realized that I can't be the only one doing this, and that a triage
summary of the linux-next fails should in theory be useful to a
bunch of people doing similar to what I do.
Quite a few fixes from me in the last while, since once you've done
the triage, you are 95% of the way towards a fix, and so I tried to
capitalize on that. No guarantees I can sustain that level of
investigation and fixing though. I expect a "this broke it" type
report (without a fix) is more likely going forward.
In any case, I'm not sure how sustainable this is during a merge
window, but lets start with this for now and see where it goes.
It will inevitably lag the linux-next release by about a day,
since the routine builds take close to that to complete.
If you see an entry that you have updated data for, please do
let me know. I'd rather report vs. reinvestigate. If you
think this concept is useful, please also let me know, since
that will no doubt influence whether I spend time on it.
Ideally, if we can keep the kisskb builds as close to 100%
green as possible, then we'll have direct visibility into any
new breakage. Having builds sit broken for six months only
manages to mask visibility into new breakage issues. :(
Thanks,
Paul.
---
Latest results at:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/
Failures as of March 6th, 2012:
===============================
ARM:arm-allnoconfig
when: forever
why: not supported
status: nothing pending, but patches accepted
fix: n/a
ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/30/105
ref: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-January/081218.html
ARM:cam60_defconfig
when: Feb 23, 16:47
why: trace_entries.h: 'perf_ftrace_event_register' undeclared
status: S. Rostedt has a patch somewhere.
fix:
ref: irc (#linux-rt)
ARM:collie_defconfig
when: Feb 14, 19:10
why: locomolcd.c: error: 'sa1100fb_lcd_power' undeclared
status: fixed (PaulG) - pending integration
fix: http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=133105157730749&w=2
ref:
ARM:iop32x_defconfig,iop33x_defconfig
when: Nov 23, 13:42
why: restart.c: implicit declaration of function 'soft_restart'
status: fixed (PaulG) - pending integration
fix: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-January/081461.html
ref:
ARM:ixp4xx_defconfig
when: Oct 26, 01:40
why: gpio.h: implicit declaration of function '__gpio_get_value'
status: fixed (Imre Kaloz) - but possibly needs rework?
fix: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/8/288
ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/8/287
ARM:magician_defconfig
when: Feb 13, 19:10
why: magician.c: unknown field 'dev' specified in initializer
status: WIP (PaulG) - may need rework, or pending integration
fix:
ref: http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=133106325903524&w=2
ARM:orion5x_defconfig
when: Mar 2, 21:27
why: "Inconsistent kallsyms data This is a bug"
status: transient? (but yet three days in a row?)
fix: n/a?
ref:
ARM:em_x270_defconfig
when: Feb 14, 01:15
why: em-x270.c: unknown field 'dev' specified in initializer
status: WIP (PaulG) - I think initial patch needs rework
fix:
ref: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg163135.html
ARM:raumfeld_defconfig
when: Nov 23, 09:36
why: eeti_ts.c: implicit declaration of function 'irq_to_gpio'
status: perhaps broken since 2010? See ref below.
fix:
ref: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1291618?do=post_view_threaded#1291618
ARM:omap2plus_defconfig
when: Feb 16, 00:23
why: control.c:238: error: 'OMAP343X_CTRL_BASE' undeclared
status: PaulG did hack-n-slash, but at best a WIP, needs additonal reverts
fix: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg163120.html
ref: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg163262.html
ARM:at91x40_defconfig
when: Feb 28, 07:38
why: super.c:(.text+0x3ffd8): undefined reference to `vm_is_stack'
status: WIP, fix from PaulG + follow on from
fix: http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=133096554131691&w=2
ref: http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=133104723928617&w=2
----------------
AVR32:allnoconfig
when: May 26 2010, 20:49
why: at32_map_usart: undefined reference to `atmel_default_console_device'
status:
fix:
ref:
---------------
bfin:***all-builds***
when: Jan 20, 22:13
why: undefined reference to `vm_is_stack'
status: WIP, fix from PaulG + follow on from Siddhesh Poyarekar
fix: http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=133096554131691&w=2
ref: http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=133104723928617&w=2
---------------
cris:***all-builds***
when: Mar 25, 22:05
why: include/linux/types.h:25: error expected ... before 'ino_t'
status:
fix:
ref:
----------------
crisv32:***all-builds***
when: Mar 25, 22:05
why: include/linux/types.h:25: error expected ... before 'ino_t'
status:
fix:
ref:
----------------
i386:allmodconfig
when: Nov 17, 16:19
why: zsmalloc-main.c:255: error: 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' undeclared
status: staging commit, reported to GregKH by PaulG.
fix:
ref:
----------------
ia64:defconfig
when: Mar 6, 21:44
why: PaulG broke lib/string.c: implicit declaration of function 'printk'
status: fixed
fix: in linux next for Mar7
ref: http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=133106828606006&w=2
----------------
m68k:***all-builds***
when: Mar 6, 21:44
why: PaulG broke lib/string.c: implicit declaration of function 'printk'
status: fixed
fix: in linux next for Mar7
ref: http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=133106828606006&w=2
----------------
mips:cavium-octeon_defconfig
when: forever
why: "Error: Bad value (octeon) for -march" -- WTF? bad toolchain?
status:
fix:
ref: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5807171/
mips:allmodconfig
when:
why: driver_pci_host.c: implicit declaration of function 'pcibios_enable_device'
status:
fix:
ref: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5807000/
----------------
parisc:***all-builds***
when: Mar 7, 00:04
why: lib/bitmap.c: implicit declaration of function 'current_thread_info'
status: fixed
fix: PaulG - needs to include thread_info in the module-3.4 branch
ref:
-----------------
parisc64:a500_defconfig
when:
why: include/linux/log2.h: implicit declaration of function 'fls'
status: reported by PaulG, WIP by David Howells
fix:
ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/29/409
ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/6/228
------------------
powerpc:allyesconfig
when: May 18 2009, 22:11
why: fat ass kernel with everything simply won't link
status: need to fix build config to ignore the final link
fix:
ref: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5806793/
------------------
sh4:***all-builds***
when: Feb 24, 17:38
why: include/linux/log2.h: implicit declaration of function 'fls'
status: reported by PaulG, WIP by David Howells
fix:
ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/29/409
ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/6/228
------------------
sparc:allmodconfig
when: Mar 2, 17:53
why: drivers/usb/gadget/pch_udc.c: implicit declaration of function 'irq_set_irq_type'
status: reported by PaulG, WIP by Tomoya MORINAGA
fix:
ref: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.next/21060
------------------
sparc64:allmodconfig
when: Mar 2, 18:51
why: drivers/usb/gadget/pch_udc.c: implicit declaration of function 'irq_set_irq_type'
status: reported by PaulG, WIP by Tomoya MORINAGA
fix:
ref: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.next/21060
------------------
um:um-defconfig
when: Sep 16 2010, 01:28
why: os-Linux/start_up.c: error: 'PTRACE_SETOPTIONS' undeclared
status: clearly broken forever, so does anyone care?
fix:
ref: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/target/2979/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists