[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331156694.12805.19.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:44:53 -0500
From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, hpa@...or.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
mingo@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/29] Disintegrate asm/system.h for C6X
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 16:43 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 21:36 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Disintegrate asm/system.h for C6X. Not compiled. Appears to be missing
> > > > asm/atomic.h and asm/bug.h.
> > >
> > > Not missing. C6X uses the asm-generic versions which makes me think that
> > > at least the atomic.h and barrier.h bits could have reasonable generic
> > > versions for UP-only systems.
> >
> > How does this work? Looking at linux/atomic.h, it should fail to build as
> > pretty much the first thing it does is include asm/atomic.h - which doesn't
> > exist for C6X. Shouldn't it at least have a #inclusion to the asm-generic
> > header?
>
> Kbuild takes care of it. See arch/c6x/include/Kbuild for the generic
^^^^^^^^
include/asm/ that is
> headers C6X uses as-is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists