[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120308072258.GB20784@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:22:58 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE
* Arun Sharma <asharma@...com> wrote:
> @@ -71,8 +71,12 @@ static int perf_evsel__add_hist_entry(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> }
>
> cursor = &evsel->hists.callchain_cursor;
> - he = __hists__add_entry_single(&evsel->hists, al, parent,
> - cursor, sample->period);
> + if (sort__first_dimension == SORT_INCLUSIVE)
> + he = __hists__add_entry_inclusive(&evsel->hists, al, parent,
> + cursor, sample->period);
> + else
> + he = __hists__add_entry_single(&evsel->hists, al, parent,
> + cursor, sample->period);
If sort__first_dimension is available to hist.c then I think
there should still be a simple __hists__add_entry() function in
hist.c, which perf_evsel__add_hist_entry() calls - which then
calls the static inline __hists__add_entry_inclusive() and
__hists__add_entry_single() functions within hist.c.
I.e. this refactoring and splitup of the function into two parts
is not a detail that should matter to builtin-report.c's
perf_evsel__add_hist_entry().
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists