[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120307171155.f9bb71b6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:11:55 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm, counters: remove task argument to sync_mm_rss
and __sync_task_rss_stat
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 19:21:39 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> -static void __sync_task_rss_stat(struct task_struct *task, struct mm_struct *mm)
> +static void __sync_task_rss_stat(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_MM_COUNTERS; i++) {
> - if (task->rss_stat.count[i]) {
> - add_mm_counter(mm, i, task->rss_stat.count[i]);
> - task->rss_stat.count[i] = 0;
> + if (current->rss_stat.count[i]) {
> + add_mm_counter(mm, i, current->rss_stat.count[i]);
> + current->rss_stat.count[i] = 0;
> }
> }
> - task->rss_stat.events = 0;
> + current->rss_stat.events = 0;
> }
hm, with my gcc it's beneficial to cache `current' in a local. But
when I tried that, Weird Things happened, because gcc has gone and
decided to inline __sync_task_rss_stat() into its callers. I don't see
how that could have been the right thing to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists