linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] UBI checkpointing support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1331205761.7257.5.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:22:41 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <rw@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] UBI checkpointing support

On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 22:01 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Please, consider an option of picking a different name. In JFFS2 a
> > "similar" thing was called "summaries", and even this is better than
> > "checkpoint", I think.
> 
> What about "Erase block indexing"?
> Basically a checkpoint is an index...

Index is also very loaded word already, and UBIFS has index, would be
nice to use a word UBIFS does not use. Thomas's suggestions like fastmap
or roadmap/milestone are fine with me. UBIUBI is clever, but probably
confusing a bit as well :-)

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/