linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5985

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADDYkjS4NctGzreFHSMFq8qBO9ZjWDntaikRq+-J-fU-Jcr_vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:33:42 +0100
From:	Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>
To:	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5985

2012/3/6 Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>:
> Hi All,
>
> I've noticed today below WARN_ON from btrfs. Google shows hits in the
> same place ([1] and [2]) but the path is different. It could happen
> when svn checout or few rsyncs were running - now I'm not able to put
> in correct timings. There's  btrfs_item_offset() in backtrace and I
> was not able to find it from btrfs kernel code - there's _nr instead.
> Am I blind?
>
> I will try to reproduce this. Any hints based on code path how could
> it be triggered?
>
> Cheers,
> -Jacek
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg15229.html
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789632
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5985
> btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xc5/0x292 [btrfs]()
> Hardware name: ProLiant BL460c G6
> Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate lzo_compress ext4 jbd2 crc16
> ipmi_devintf autofs4 be2iscsi iscsi_boot_sysfs ib_iser rdma_cm ib_cm
> iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_addr iscsi_tcp bnx2i cnic uio ipv6 cxgb3i
> libcxgbi iw_cxgb3 ib_core cxgb3 libiscsi_tcp libiscsi
> scsi_transport_iscsi dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_multipath
> video battery acpi_pad acpi_ipmi ac parport usbhid evdev
> acpi_power_meter radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm hwmon backlight
> i2c_algo_bit ipmi_si bnx2x ipmi_msghandler i2c_core hpilo hpwdt
> psmouse mdio ehci_hcd uhci_hcd
> Pid: 4865, comm: flush-btrfs-11 Tainted: G        W    3.2.7 #2
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffffa038461f>] ? btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xc5/0x292 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffff8106901d>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0x8d
>  [<ffffffffa038461f>] ? btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xc5/0x292 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa039ebad>] ? btrfs_item_offset+0x2c/0x61 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa03737dc>] ? leaf_space_used+0x86/0xb5 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa0377a7a>] ? split_leaf+0x2d9/0x632 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa0379261>] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x6c1/0x75a [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa0379e6e>] ? btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x61/0xab [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa039507c>] ? insert_inline_extent+0xea/0x2d4 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa0395389>] ? cow_file_range_inline+0x123/0x163 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa038fc2c>] ? start_transaction+0x1d5/0x205 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa0397137>] ? cow_file_range+0x113/0x337 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa0379653>] ? btrfs_next_leaf+0x359/0x36a [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa0397d7b>] ? run_delalloc_nocow+0x5d9/0x673 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa0397e8b>] ? run_delalloc_range+0x76/0x338 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffff811ef37c>] ? blk_queue_bio+0x2db/0x2fb
>  [<ffffffffa03a9367>] ? __extent_writepage+0x259/0x689 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffff811eef50>] ? generic_make_request+0x90/0xde
>  [<ffffffff811ef06a>] ? submit_bio+0xcc/0xd5
>  [<ffffffffa03a4fcc>] ? extent_writepages+0x1cc/0x2d5 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffffa0398ed4>] ? uncompress_inline+0x141/0x141 [btrfs]
>  [<ffffffff81137956>] ? writeback_single_inode+0x109/0x291
>  [<ffffffff81137fde>] ? writeback_sb_inodes+0x156/0x1fe
>  [<ffffffff81138461>] ? wb_writeback+0x10a/0x1f8
>  [<ffffffff81073b4b>] ? lock_timer_base+0x26/0x4b
>  [<ffffffff811385bb>] ? wb_do_writeback+0x6c/0x1c1
>  [<ffffffff813e2e22>] ? schedule_timeout+0x1d6/0x1f4
>  [<ffffffff81073c7b>] ? msleep+0x1e/0x1e
>  [<ffffffff81138802>] ? bdi_writeback_thread+0x7d/0x1c1
>  [<ffffffff81138785>] ? wakeup_flusher_threads+0x75/0x75
>  [<ffffffff810822aa>] ? kthread+0x7e/0x86
>  [<ffffffff813e6a74>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>  [<ffffffff8108222c>] ? kthread_stop+0xa8/0xa8
>  [<ffffffff813e6a70>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> ---[ end trace 1547a049b7c6896a ]---
> use_block_rsv: 11 callbacks suppressed
> btrfs: block rsv returned -28
> ------------[ cut here ]------------

I've tried to catch that issue. Looks like that it occurs when there's
a data move between NFS and BTRFS (now I have a dump of all processes
from the system when issue popped up). I did not found a trigger for
this but it seem to go inline with Niks observations [1].

-Jacek

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg15292.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/