[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E18D154F-E02F-4DF9-8749-7F9EF92792CB@enac.fr>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:48:24 +0100
From: Stéphane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>
To: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"benjamin.tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] HID: autoload hid-multitouch as needed
Le 8 mars 2012 à 12:30, Henrik Rydberg a écrit :
>
> The device-driver matching is done in the kernel, but driver (aka
> module) loading is done from userland. The crux is to be able to tell
> userland what driver to load for a certain device. In this case, it
> means giving more information to userland via the device/modalias
> construct. Or at least, that is the question. :-)
>
Oook, I understand. The current solution used by distros is to load the hid module statically, but then we don't want to do it for every new kind of device-specific module, right? Is this your point?
I had the feeling that the current hid code was somehow trying to be universal, thus making the point moot, and figured that we would need to reintegrate hid-multitouch into hid-core at some point. You're suggesting another, more distributed option, in which new categories of HID devices appear from time to time and are handled in new modules, right? Sounds interesting to me, I'd like to hear what the original designers of the hid module think of it.
Cheers,
St.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists