linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/2] dlm: Do not allocate a fd for peeloff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1331222159-28980-2-git-send-email-bpoirier@suse.de>
Date:	Thu,  8 Mar 2012 10:55:59 -0500
From:	Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.de>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>,
	David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] dlm: Do not allocate a fd for peeloff

avoids allocating a fd that a) propagates to every kernel thread and
usermodehelper b) is not properly released.

References: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network.drbd/22529
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.de>
---
 fs/dlm/lowcomms.c |   22 ++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
index 0b3109e..ca0c59a 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/sctp.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <net/sctp/sctp.h>
 #include <net/sctp/user.h>
 #include <net/ipv6.h>
 
@@ -474,9 +475,6 @@ static void process_sctp_notification(struct connection *con,
 			int prim_len, ret;
 			int addr_len;
 			struct connection *new_con;
-			sctp_peeloff_arg_t parg;
-			int parglen = sizeof(parg);
-			int err;
 
 			/*
 			 * We get this before any data for an association.
@@ -525,23 +523,19 @@ static void process_sctp_notification(struct connection *con,
 				return;
 
 			/* Peel off a new sock */
-			parg.associd = sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id;
-			ret = kernel_getsockopt(con->sock, IPPROTO_SCTP,
-						SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF,
-						(void *)&parg, &parglen);
+			sctp_lock_sock(con->sock->sk);
+			ret = sctp_do_peeloff(con->sock->sk,
+				sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id,
+				&new_con->sock);
+			sctp_release_sock(con->sock->sk);
 			if (ret < 0) {
 				log_print("Can't peel off a socket for "
 					  "connection %d to node %d: err=%d",
-					  parg.associd, nodeid, ret);
-				return;
-			}
-			new_con->sock = sockfd_lookup(parg.sd, &err);
-			if (!new_con->sock) {
-				log_print("sockfd_lookup error %d", err);
+					  (int)sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id,
+					  nodeid, ret);
 				return;
 			}
 			add_sock(new_con->sock, new_con);
-			sockfd_put(new_con->sock);
 
 			log_print("connecting to %d sctp association %d",
 				 nodeid, (int)sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id);
-- 
1.7.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/