[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120308182622.GC25508@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:26:22 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
缪 勰 <miaox@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] cgroup: fix race between fork and cgroup freezing
Hello, Li, Frederic.
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 04:45:13PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> +static void freezer_post_fork(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> + struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + struct freezer *freezer;
> +
> + cgroup_lock();
> +
> + freezer = task_freezer(task);
> + if (!freezer->css.cgroup->parent)
> + goto out;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&freezer->lock);
> + if (freezer->state != CGROUP_THAWED)
> + freeze_task(task);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&freezer->lock);
> +out:
> + cgroup_unlock();
> +}
Urgh... this is requiring policy implementations to synchronize with
problem caused by cgroup core optimization and it's so very subtle.
IMHO, this definitely should be contained in cgroup core and in a very
confined form even inside cgroup core.
Any other ideas?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists