[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADDYkjTG-q5+pFRFt9sGKq=cgL=ZgQaNZV=2ipBsSbuvxCa3jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:35:06 +0100
From: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>
To: dave@...os.cz, Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, josef@...hat.com
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1466!
2012/3/8 David Sterba <dave@...os.cz>:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:10:45PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
>> kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1466!
>
> 1461 ret = btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata(trans, root, item);
> 1462 /*
> 1463 * we have reserved enough space when we start a new transaction,
> 1464 * so reserving metadata failure is impossible.
> 1465 */
> 1466 BUG_ON(ret);
>
>> RAX: 00000000ffffffe4
>
> ENOSPC
>
>> [<ffffffffa03210e5>] ? __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x172/0x25e [btrfs]
>> [<ffffffffa032158c>] ? btrfs_rename+0x38b/0x55b [btrfs]
>
> rename reserves 20 blocks, but seems that's not enough. I've never seen
> a crash report in rename, and according to the stacktrace there's
> nothing suspicious (like selinux related).
There were quite many things happening in the system at that time.
Can't really tell what could trigger this.
Complete logs: http://91.234.146.107/~difrost/logs/tampere_log.gz
-Jacek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists