[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXpQOpAN64gfG-=iyXXy4Tid=9FyKVrT2grQxRgNPC-fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:02:50 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] c/r: prctl: Add ability to set new mm_struct::exe_file v3
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 11:31:58AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> ...
>> > + err = -EACCES;
>> > + if (!S_ISREG(dentry->d_inode->i_mode) ||
>> > + exe_file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOEXEC)
>> > + goto exit;
>>
>> I'm starting to notice that this pattern (testing ISREG and
>> MNT_NOEXEC) is getting repeated a few times in the kernel, and at
>> least the no-new-privs patch (not yet in -mm but hopefully soon given
>> the seccomp_filter work) updates this pattern everywhere. Perhaps this
>> should be extracted into a helper first, and then this patch can call
>> that helper here? (And then nnp can just update the single helper.)
>>
>
> I can do that if Andrew agree.
I'm a bit lost. nnp updates the MNT_NOSUID checks, not the MNT_NOEXEC
checks. (And the effects of the two flags is different in selinux for
historical reasons.) I'm sure I'm missing something.
--Andy
>
> Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists