linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] [IA64] hpsim, fix SAL handling in fw-emu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:29:55 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc:	alan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] [IA64] hpsim, fix SAL handling in fw-emu

On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:01:16PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> The switch-cases of SAL_FREQ_BASE generate non-relocatable code. The
> same as for the ifs one level upper. This causes oopses early in boot
> because the kernel jumps to the hell instead of the offset in sal
> callback.
> 
> So use ifs here for SAL_FREQ_BASE decision too.
> 
> Isn't there any compiler directive or settings to solve that cleanly?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>

<snip>

Thanks for these, that works, I'll get back to applying the reset of
your series.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/