[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120308210537.GA32436@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:05:37 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: Optionally count subdirectories to support buggy
applications
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:47:27AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't remember. I thought there was a proposed patch for this issue
> > from Eric, but I don't see it in my queue anywhere.
>
> That patch was an abortion. Adding a config option for behavior like
> this is totally bogus, and the only reason for that config option was
> that sysfs did silly things.
>
> It's only in -next, though, I was assuming that the whole "Kill nlink
> counting" commit never makes it to me. Because I won't take it.
>
> I outlined how the counting could easily be done without actually
> having to maintain an explicit count in the sysfs.
>
> Or we should just keep doing the counting.
Ok, I've now reverted this patch in my tree.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists