[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331241940.25686.502.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:25:40 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.2.9-rt17
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Now put the thing on 2 cpus and both tasks can endlessly chase each
> other's tail, no?
How would this be different than what mainline does? When the lock is
released, it will wake up the other task.
> The yield will be useless there..
If there's no task with the same priority, it should be a nop. I don't
see anything wrong with it.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists