[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331249746.3105.40.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:35:46 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the arm tree
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 16:52 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 14:51 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Mikey,
> >
> > On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:33:56 +1100 Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Surely we only need SPARSE_IRQ now and not MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ.
> > >
> > > In fact, keeping MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to make SPARSE_IRQ user
> > > selectable, which we don't want anymore since ad5b7f1350c2.
> >
> > Yes, indeed. I will fix up the merge resolution for tomorrow.
>
> This is my fault. Grant's patch had a collision and I manually fixed it
> up. While doing that, I put back MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ which the patch
> originally took out.
Actually, I didn't keep MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ, I kept HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ. If
I remove it, then I get Kconfig warnings:
warning: (PPC) selects SPARSE_IRQ which has unmet direct dependencies (HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS && HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists