[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120309000621.GA12083@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 16:06:22 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
Cc: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>, balbi@...com,
Matt Porter <mporter@...com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc-smsc911x: add required smsc911x
regulators
* Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com> [120308 12:54]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> writes:
>
> > * Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com> [120307 11:05]:
> >> >
> >> > I don't think the second smsc911x on the Overo, "smsc911x.1", would
> >> > find it due to the dev_id.
> >>
> >> It's not about finding the second regulator. As stated in the
> >> changelog, it's about the duplicate attempt to register the exact same
> >> platform_device.
> >>
> >> Duplicate attempts to register the exact same platform_device cause
> >> kobject to panic and give up[1]. So, any platform that calls
> >> gpmc_smsc911x_init() twice (Overo and T35 in mainline) will panic on
> >> boot.
> >>
> >> This patch fixes those platforms so they can boot.
> >
> > Yeah but I guess the second smsc911x instance still would not work,
> > or am I missing something?
>
> I don't know since my Overo expansion boards don't have a 2nd NIC, but I
> suspect you're right.
>
> However, my fix isn't addressing that. I am fixing a problem where
> mainline today will panic on some boards due to duplicate registration.
>
> If the 2nd interface doesn't work, then the original patch that added
> the regulators needs a rethink. My patch to prevent the panic() is
> needed for mainline.
With Kevin's second version of this patch applied we avoid the panic
on boards with more than one smsc911x.
After this patch, board-*.c files can add custom regulators for their
other smsc911x instances.
We should also add a regulator to the struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data,
and then only initialize the fixed regulator automatically
if (!board_data->regulator && !board_data->id).
So I've pushed Kevin's second version of the fix to fix-smsc911x-regulator
branch.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists