linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 x86 1/2] fix page faults by nmiaction in nmi if kmemcheck is enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1331286756.13274.26.camel@ThinkPad-T420>
Date:	Fri, 09 Mar 2012 04:52:36 -0500
From:	Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, acme@...stprotocols.net, tony.luck@...el.com,
	bp@...64.org, robert.richter@....com, lenb@...nel.org,
	minyard@....org, wim@...ana.be, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
	oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 x86 1/2] fix page faults by nmiaction in nmi if
 kmemcheck is enabled

On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 11:27 +0100, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On 6 March 2012 11:09, Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > This patch tries to fix the problem of page fault exception caused by
> > accessing nmiaction structure in nmi if kmemcheck is enabled.
> >
> > If kmemcheck is enabled, the memory allocated through slab are in pages
> > that are marked non-present, so that some checks could be done in the
> > page fault handling code ( e.g. whether the memory is read before
> > written to ).
> > As nmiaction is allocated in this way, so it resides in a non-present
> > page. Then there is a page fault while the nmi code accessing the
> > nmiaction structure, which would then cause a warning by
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()) in kmemcheck_fault(), called by do_page_fault().
> >
> > v2: as Peter suggested, changed the nmiaction to use static storage.
> >
> > v3: as Peter suggested, use macro to shorten the codes. Also keep the
> > original usage of register_nmi_handler, so users of this call doesn't
> > need change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Looks like you've solved this now. Thanks.

There is still one place [2/2] not solved ... and I guess it might need
the way you suggested below.

> 
> For the record, another way to prevent the page fault from happening
> in the first place is to set up a new slab cache with the flag
> SLAB_NOTRACK. This is different from the GFP_NOTRACK flag which, as
> you noted, doesn't prevent page faults, just inhibits
> checking/warnings for those memory areas.
> 
> It's a bit of a hassle, I admit. Maybe we could create an additional,
> separate set of slab caches (using SLAB_NOTRACK) and a new GFP flag
> which selects this set of caches instead. This would allow anything
> that takes a gfp_t to allocate memory that is guaranteed not to page
> fault when using kmemcheck. Pekka, any thoughts?
> 

I'm not sure whether I understand it correctly? 
  If CONFIG_KMEMCHECK is enabled, create another two sets of
malloc_sizes caches, one for cs_cachep, one for cs_dmacachep, both with
SLAB_NOTRACK flag. 

  Create a new GFP flag, like __GFP_NO_PF for those places where page
fault is not allowed, and return memory from the caches created above.
This new GFP flag is set to 0 if CONFIG_KMEMCHECK is not enabled. 

I think there shouldn't be many such cases, so most of these caches
wouldn't actually be used ...

Thanks,
Zhong

> 
> Vegard
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/