[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120309110028.GB3852@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:00:28 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Javier Martin <javier.martin@...ta-silicon.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, vinod.koul@...el.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] dmaengine: imx-dma: merge old dma-v1.c with
imx-dma.c
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 03:33:33PM +0100, Javier Martin wrote:
> It is mainly a simple merge changing the prefix of some
> functions to fit the imx-dma namings.
>
> As there are no users of the old dma-v1.c api we can safely
> remove this file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martin <javier.martin@...ta-silicon.com>
> ---
> @@ -633,11 +1127,8 @@ static int __exit imxdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> dma_async_device_unregister(&imxdma->dma_device);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < MAX_DMA_CHANNELS; i++) {
> - struct imxdma_channel *imxdmac = &imxdma->channel[i];
> -
> - imx_dma_free(imxdmac->imxdma_channel);
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_DMA_CHANNELS; i++)
> + free_irq(MX2x_INT_DMACH0 + i, NULL);
This lacks a test for i.MX1/21/27. The above is correct for i.MX21/27,
but on i.MX1 you have to free MX1_DMA_INT/MX1_DMA_ERR.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists