[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120309135939.GC2114@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:59:40 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] genirq: No need to check IRQTF_DIED before stopping a
thread handler
Since 63706172f332fd3f6e7458ebfb35fa6de9c21dc5 kthread_stop() is not
afraid of dead kernel threads. So no need to check if a thread is
alive before stopping it. These checks still were racy.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 ++----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 0fa3ce9..3feab4a 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1106,8 +1106,7 @@ out_thread:
struct task_struct *t = new->thread;
new->thread = NULL;
- if (likely(!test_bit(IRQTF_DIED, &new->thread_flags)))
- kthread_stop(t);
+ kthread_stop(t);
put_task_struct(t);
}
out_mput:
@@ -1217,8 +1216,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
#endif
if (action->thread) {
- if (!test_bit(IRQTF_DIED, &action->thread_flags))
- kthread_stop(action->thread);
+ kthread_stop(action->thread);
put_task_struct(action->thread);
}
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists