lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:34:03 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Chanho Min <chanho0207@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Shreshtha Kumar Sahu <shreshthakumar.sahu@...ricsson.com>,
	"Kim, Jong-Sung" <neidhard.kim@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clear previous interrupts after fifo is disabled

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:30:20PM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
>> This is another workaroud of  'https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/17/104'
>> with additional analysis.Bootloader can transfer control to kernel and
>> there are some pending interrupts. In this case, RXFE of the flag
>> register is set by clearing FEN(LCRH) even if rx data remains in the
>> fifo. It seems that the fifo's status is initiailized. Interrupt
>> handler can not get any data from data register because of the below
>> break condtion.
>>
>> pl011_fifo_to_tty
>>  while (max_count--) {
>>    if (status & UART01x_FR_RXFE)
>>       break;
>
> This patch never seemed to be agreed on, so I'm not taking it.
>
> Can someone, if this is still needed, and everyone agrees on how to
> solve it, please send me the needed fix?

To me it seems Russell's patch solves part of the problem,
and Jong-Sung Kim's patch on top of that solves the entire
problem, but Chanho need to come back and tell whether
this is the case in practice.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ